Nowadays, it is widely argued whether genetic modification is a possible danger for our planet or if it could be viewed as a positive development for the lives of most people in various ways. Personally speaking, I believe that, although genetic engineering can have some negative implications, in overall it can significantly improve the quality of life on earth.
The main two arguments of those who consider genetic technologies as a threat to the environment and its natural inhabitants are the following; First of all, a lot of people believe that genetically modified food could possibly temper the balance of various ecosystems around the world. For example, by cultivating special crops that are resistant in diseases and their natural predators in places like Egypt, could have a negative effect for the environment. Secondly, there are those who view genetic coding as an even bigger danger for humans. That is because many people fear that this technology will be used by governments to raise new armies by creating genetically developed men and start world war between continents.
A more optimistic view, and one that I favor, recognizes the possibly negative outcomes of the above-mentioned technology, however, estimates that governments and people can help themselves greatly by using it reasonably. Genetic engineering can help by creating more crops and multiplying the amount of food available on the planet. Therefore, famine which is one of the most severe problems in Africa, can be directly addressed. In addition, genetic technology can facilitate the effort of producing new medicine, such as vaccine or anti-biotics, and help mankind deal with long-term illnesses like cancer.
In conclusion, I believe that genetic engineering can increase in many ways the quality of life on earth, despite its potentially hazardous misuse.
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 78
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Some People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... believe that genetically modified food could possibly temper the balance of various ecosystem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40206185567 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0282421808 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8426750648 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204810623484 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782983397279 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048636699822 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135518047128 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419990924969 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.