Give your opinions on whether machines will replace humans in the hospitality industry.
The hospitality area is witnessing an upsurge in the development in the usage of machines, and whether these tools would substitute for humans in carrying out in this area is still left debatable. From my perspective, machines can become effective tools of humans, however, they can not completely replace humans in all facets in the industry.
The growth of the robotics sector has been extremely advantageous for the hospitality industry. Robots may assist staff to work more efficiently, complete tasks more quickly, and add to customer experiences. For instance, the check-in and check-out procedures are handled by a humanoid female robot and a dinosaur at the Henn-na hotel in Japan, which is staffed nearly completely by robots. Additionally, Costa Coffee US applies automated kiosk-style machines that can swiftly take and complete client custom coffee orders.
Nevertheless, with Guestology at the core, there are some activities that machines might not be able to perform as well as humans do, particularly those that demand emotional intelligence, empathy, and interpersonal skills. In the hospitality sector, these skills are essential, and companies that place a heavy emphasis on automation run the danger of losing the human touch that guests crave. For instance, certain flight attendants frequently crouch down and place their ears near to the guests when they are unable to hear the customer's request. Could a robot perform this action? Moreover, clients who use the services of the hospitality industry frequently seek personalized and distinctive experiences, which can only be given by people. A case in point is that no one visits a spa solely to receive massage service from the rough hands of robots.
Realizing those advantages and disadvantages, in my opinion, the best method is to get service robots and service cast to co-work in hospitality. Robots will perform human-unneeded tasks, while humans should always be central to improving guest experience, including performing tasks that require human interaction and offering improvement initiatives in service products, service settings, and service delivery system.
In conclusion, notwithstanding that machines would be companions of people in the hospitality sector, they can not completely replace humans is impossible in this particular industry.
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles would be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process of making sugar from sugar cane 89
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56460674157 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04208555056 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.757485536 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205197486273 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589855414733 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530918519953 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117461988519 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511051118929 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56460674157 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04208555056 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.757485536 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205197486273 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589855414733 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530918519953 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117461988519 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511051118929 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.