Giving detailed descriptions of crimes on TV or newspapers has bad influences, so information of this kind in the media should be restricted. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Stories of crime are frequently covered in the press. How detailed those stories are is a matter of debate. Some believe that such an approach to news coverage is highly damaging, while others think otherwise. In my opinion, restrictions are necessary.
To start with, detailed reports which are shown on the TV or newspaper could be a helpful source for would-be wrongdoers to learn and draw experience from. Normally, a criminal description comprises various sophisticated tricks, techniques that have been used, and how the police handle that case step by step. By learning from that, individuals could enhance those skills to a higher level, and also could comprehend ways to avoid the police hunt. Therefore, it would be more and more complicated for those offenders to be apprehended.
Furthermore, the impact on youngsters is deleterious/detrimental/injurious. The frequent exposure to violent programs makes those fragile children even more vulnerable. The mind is embedded by those offenses, thereby turning that individual into a dangerous criminal who is hard to be reeducated.
Critics of the above idea might claim that by giving a detailed report in mass media, governments could draw public attention to the case, which contributes to the process of investigation. This is true to some extent. Public support is necessary but should only stop at providing information about the case. In some circumstances, where so dedicated and curious are people that they decided to investigate alone, it would be very dangerous for their life.
To conclude, regulations need to be imposed by policy makers and authorities. Both children and adults deserve to live in a world which is free of worries and concerns caused by criminal attempts. News is to inform, not to mess things up.
- In some developed countries people become fat because they eat too much junk food Suggest some ways that governments and food companies can encourage people to stay fit and eat a healthy diet 93
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 61
- What do you think about technology in education What are the pros and cons 51
- The graphs shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 11
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32993636713 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9573529052 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7222222222 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166641485428 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460445183869 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467383082542 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722492878729 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468538246059 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.