The government and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals. Do you agree or disagree?
I think that government and individuals are not spending too much money on national celebrations. Because it brings many benefits for society and national economies.
Spending money on national celebrations affects positively to society. Firstly, people have the time and the places to rest or to play. They have many opportunities relaxing after their busy days at works. If Tet holiday is not organized, people will not the time to rest and time for their family. Secondly, spending money to organized celebrations help people maintain the national traditions. Nowadays, more foreign festivals are imported. The young people are attracted to them and forget the traditional festivals. For example, in many cities children don’t parade lantern in The Middle Moon. Thirdly, this is the good approach to educate children about their national culture. Before Tet holiday, the many programs teach children method to make Chung cake.
On the other hand, spend money on national celebrations is a beneficial investment. The festivals will attract many tourists and local residents will receive much revenue from buying souvenirs and the services. In Hue’s festival, there are billions of people to attend. This helps the hotels, restaurants earn much money. Moreover, celebrations promote economic development. In days of celebrations, consumption increases dramatically. People purchase goods, go to shopping to prepare for celebrations. In Tet holiday, they often buy many beautiful clothes for their family, many presents for a relationship.
From the reason mentioned above, I believe the actions of investing on national celebrations is a wise response of the government to people’s expectation.
- cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity? 78
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The only way to improve the safety on our own road is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities but not on the arts Do you agree or disagree 79
- Many people say that we have developed into a throw away culture because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To what extent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can you recomm 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67441860465 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.030065874 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8444676466 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.7142857143 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.2857142857 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211152953853 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725492888888 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108553111135 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162041740143 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825811431379 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.