Government of developing country should spend more on projects (eg new tourist hotel, factories) to improve local economy and less on facilities (eg health and education) To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is said that for the improvement of the local economy, it would be better for officials in developing countries to invest more in some projects related to tourist hotels and factories instead of those in the realm of health and education. I agree with this point of view to some extent.
On the one hand, I can explain why it is necessary for the government to spend money on health and education systems. Health and education are the basic needs of human beings. If the government funds the health centres, health workers will be able to provide more facilities for patients to be treated as soon as possible. In this situation, more working adults are healthy enough to work hard and pay taxes which can be used by the government for the construction of hotels and factories. Also, a well-funded education system is considered an indicator for the assessment of the economic progression of each country. This is because schools and universities are places in which educated people are taught and raised. These are individuals who can help the economy of their countries with their creative and innovative ideas. So, it is necessary for the state to subsidize these systems for having a thriving economy.
However, I also believe that the investment in projects related to tourism industries and factories should not be ignored, as they have some benefits for the countries. Tourists can contribute to the economic success of the host country because of the money they are willing to spend on a wide range of products and services, including souvenirs, food and accommodation. Additionally, the construction of tourist hotels and factories can provide more job opportunities for local people in order to have a better quality of life. Also, these factors help the country to expand its international exchanges with other countries. This situation can reinforce the economic condition of the developing countries among their first-world counterparts.
In conclusion, in my view, the government has to consider all systems and facilities and equally allocate the state budget among them. This is because, each part has its own benefits for people, and they should not be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s among their first-world counterparts. In conclusion, in my view, the governmen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, as to, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09192200557 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86038110952 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49860724234 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0321403353 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228472727542 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072620625306 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511819734996 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146937317235 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627508662908 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.