The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
Allocating funds from the government in the field of sciences is considered important for the progress and development of a country. I partially agree with this opinion. While it is important to provide sufficient financial help to the scientific researches, it is also necessary to give importance to other sectors too.
Firstly, technology dominates the modern world in every possible way and as a result, advancements in science are a must. Providing more budget to teach science which is an important sector can help in this regard. For example, China and Japan have recently spent a lot towards technological developments and thus become powerhouses in today’s world. Robots have replaced humans in many jobs which was only possible due to a significant rise in robotic experiments. New inventions can only take place if there are enough finances and facilities available for looking into a specific matter. Improvements in sciences can help people lead a better life.
On the other hand, sectors like arts or business also play a vital role in developing a nation. For instance, France or Italy is highly recognized to outer world due to high artistic histories. If there was no art or music, then there would have been no beautiful drama or soothing song in our world. If there was no business, no trading could take place in daily life. Topics like economics or history also contribute a lot to build a nation. Therefore, it is almost equally important sanction sufficient budgets for teaching those subjects too.
To conclude, even though the current world is hugely affected by scientific findings, the government should take other areas into consideration too while providing funds. Only a good balance will lead the nation to a better future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ajayjain831 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | eppa akhil | 56 | view |
- The charts below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 61
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 78
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill lead the nation to a better future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17361111111 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85900129532 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5814319039 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6470588235 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177419091611 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538285997677 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678741773677 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106480358972 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510689536082 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.