Nowadays, it is impossible to deny the fact that both sciences and non-science subjects play crucial part in our society. Whether governments should allocate more funds to science subjects has sparked a heated debate. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that sciences are the core elements of a society and every other subjects can only progress on the wings of sciences, and I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, science subjects train students critical thinking with questions related to technology, environment and medicine. For instance, by studying sciences subjects, scientists and engineers designed and developed technologies on internet and smart phones, while doctors and researchers innovated and discovered new medicines for cancer and other long-term diseases. In this case, sciences completely change how the world operates and improve everyone’s health. Without sciences, information and ideas are hard to get across between nations and individuals, and large number of people will suffer from cancer and other long-term diseases. As a result, governments should invest more funds in technology development and medicine research projects.
Furthermore, another reason making sciences more important than other subjects is that it increased productivity. The advanced machines and manufacturing processes developed by engineers and scientists were found to increase 70% of the productivity in China in the last decade according to one of the studies done by University of New South Wales. Therefore, sciences boosted productivity of a nation and ultimately lead to economic growth.
In conclusion, governments must allocate additional funds to technology, medicine and research related subjects as they increase productivity and improve everyone’s living standards. Education of these subjects should also be encouraged with related scholarships and advanced facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...jects play crucial part in our society. Whether governments should allocate more funds ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88928571429 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11320221978 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7218895065 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291745948016 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105719264959 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805777379347 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169014674704 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514677208492 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.