The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays, it is impossible to deny the fact that science subjects bring positive impact to the society, whether governments should allocate more funds to sciences has sparked a heated debate. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that sciences are the core elements of a society and other subjects can only progress on the wings of sciences, and I will elaborate in the following essay.

To begin with, science subjects develop student’s critical thinking ability through experiment and research. Students learn to think logically in urgent situations and develop their ideas based on solid scientific evidence instead of believing superstition. For instance, 83% of workers in management positions studied sciences in schools according to one of the researches done by University of Sydney. Hence, investing more funds in sciences enhance a nation’s progress towards a more developed and civilized society.

Furthermore, another reason making sciences more important than other subjects, such as literature, art and music, is that it increased productivity. The advanced machines and manufacturing processes developed by engineers and scientists were found to increase 70% of the productivity in China in the last decade according to the report released by Chinese Ministry of Economic Affairs. Therefore, sciences boosted productivity of a nation and ultimately lead to economic growth.

In conclusion, governments must allocate more funds to scientific subjects as they increase productivity and encourage individual’s critical thinking. At the same time, policies encouraging scientific studies should be made and promoted in local schools and universities through advance facilities and teaching materials.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84251968504 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17802142844 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1928902306 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295020975714 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103310825738 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682238315374 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164860975425 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523523581676 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.