The government should close companies that provide toxic waste materials without their own waste treatmemt facility in order to protect the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your position

Environmental pollution has become a great concern worldwide and governments are considering several steps to be taken to tackle this global issue. One of which is to shut the companies, which produce enormous amount of rubbish and are the least concerned about its devastating effects on the environment. I do agree with this decision and strongly favor this step.

First reason to support my viewpoint is that, majority of these companies are profit- driven and owners only keep their profitable targets in their minds while manufacturing products. They ignore all the other aspects related to maintaining air, water and soul sanctity. It is observed that tonnes of gallons of chemical water from these factories is mixing in rivers and canals and polluting these valuable resources everyday. Poisonous smoke emits and degrade the air quality which we breathe in.

Another factor is these business giants invest huge amount of money to promote and extend businesses on a large scale. However, these are not much bothered about protecting environment and never spend a penny to adopt safety measures or establishing recycling plants. Proprietors think that it is the responsibility of authorities to control the problem of pollution. Their selfish motives lead to huge losses of natural resources.

Despite that, some people suggest that if these companies are stopped to do manufacturing, there will be scarcity of products which, in turn, put pressure on governments to import from other countries. Moreover, it will sabotage the development and hit the economy of the country. Still, I assume that companies should not be allowed to do production at the cost of damaging the atmosphere.

To conclude, strict actions should be taken by the government to stop these greed- ridden companies to do exorbitant production or these should be strictly ordered to follow the instructions to save our surroundings.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal water from these factories is mixing in rivers and canals and polluting these...
^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... and polluting these valuable resources everyday. Poisonous smoke emits and degrade the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces everyday. Poisonous smoke emits and degrade the air quality which we breathe...
^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this greed' or 'these greeds'?
Suggestion: this greed; these greeds
...ould be taken by the government to stop these greed- ridden companies to do exorbitant prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3399339934 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88390309065 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1865383571 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119403835344 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336820071849 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374272486698 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063309665401 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254959620172 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.