Government should replace the historic monuments with the modern buildings .Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Historic as well as modern buildings plays very important role for every nation. Regime's must replace the historic buildings with the modern buildings. I partially agree with this statement. I will discuss my both view points in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On the unitary hand, historic buildings provide unlimited knowledge to the masses and our younger generation about their nation history. Which helps them to keep in touch with their country. Apart from this, masses can also known the struggle of older people in their past time. To examplify every nation have approximately more than 20 to 30 historic monuments. which are under the supervision of governing bodies. Tourist can grab mammoth knowledge about other nations, which increases the reputation of that country ,when the know know about the history.
Conversely, unquestionably, historic monuments plays very important role in every country but modern buildings are also necessary for the individual's. Modern buildings would provide employment opportunities to the people who are unable to get work due to unemployment in the country. This will also help in the development of nation.
To sum up, historic monuments as well as modern buildings both plays a vital role. However, books are enough to know or grab the knowledge about history. Nevertheless, modern buildings would helpful to the upcoming generation in which they can get unlimited employment opportunities and can get rid of the unemployment
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Government should replace the historic monuments with the modern buildings Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... generation about their nation history. Which helps them to keep in touch with their ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...n the struggle of older people in their past time. To examplify every nation have approxi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
... more than 20 to 30 historic monuments. which are under the supervision of governing ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... more than 20 to 30 historic monuments. which are under the supervision of governing ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...increases the reputation of that country ,when the know know about the history. ...
^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es the reputation of that country ,when the know know about the history. Conversely, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: know
...he reputation of that country ,when the know know about the history. Conversely, unque...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso help in the development of nation. To sum up, historic monuments as well as...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88499147371 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0456463642 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.125 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.375 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278334533958 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104067163915 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113701538683 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189189525809 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111622645121 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.