Railways and roads are two very common transportation options for a modern city. When it comes to the priority of government investment, people express different voices. Some say both of them deserve an equal attention, some prefer roads over railways, while I, personally lean to the railways.
Railways is much more environmentally friendly. Unlike cars, people could not find a exhaust system built in any recent train. This is a concrete indication that implies less emission, since almost all nowadays railway solutions are powered by electricity. In addition, railways occupy less ground and can be expanded in a three dimension manner which is believed a very good approach to limit the environment impact.
From consumer's perspective, railways are offering better user experiences. Punctuation is the most significant one. Many the modern city suffers from traffic jam due to the increasing number of vehicles owned by families and business entities, while in the other hands, railways, by their nature, are immure to this problem. Because all systems are supposed to be running on a delicate tempo and they are many supervisions to prevent them from losing synchronization. On top of punctuation, users would seldom have a bumpy ride on railways. When a roads is easily getting lacking for maintenance, and it would become degraded rapidly, but the rails are always under close monitoring leaving it no chance to degrade.
Roads are definitely useful under certain situations. Like building a train station in a town with relative small population may not be a financially wise choice, it makes roads the best complementary solution for these remote settlements.
With all above opinions considered, I would agree that government should increase the fund towards the railways than roads in general, but still, they should have a case-by-case analysis to put the money in the most efficient and effective use.
- Schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dly. Unlike cars, people could not find a exhaust system built in any recent trai...
^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'immured'.
Suggestion: immured
...r hands, railways, by their nature, are immure to this problem. Because all systems ar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a road' or simply 'roads'?
Suggestion: a road; roads
...dom have a bumpy ride on railways. When a roads is easily getting lacking for maintenan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92802488891 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659016393443 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9154351983 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127919750197 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341330816074 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503713666783 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732076803313 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693230810195 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.