No doubt, alterations are indispensable in the field of transportation. However, it has become an issue of debate that the disbursement of money should rather be on railways than the road system. I fully agree with the given statement and further, the divergent viewpoints are yet to be supported in the subsequent paragraphs.
Spending money on railways seems to be effective in certain ways, but the first and foremost benefit is the deterioration of accidents as the number of people dies while driving private vehicles on the roads. For instance, annual global road crash statistics clearly illustrate that around 1.25 million folks die in road crashes each year, an average of 3,287 deaths in a day. Besides this, a large number of vehicles tend to create pollution, which leads to noxious diseases such as asthma, skin and lung cancer and many more; therefore, the train system is one of the prominent ways that need to be promoted to solve this matter.
To commence with, trains tend to have high speed as comparing to vehicles, since there is no traffic congestion on the railway tracks that is usually on the roads; thus, this speed helps to solve the precious time of humans and they do not have to wait for a long time to commute from one place to another. Moreover, trains are the cheapest mode of transportation as compared to other vehicles; meanwhile, people do not have to spend much money on traveling their destinations.
In conclusion, given the significance of trains, the government should allocate more funds to the railway system rather than the road system for the welfare of people in the fast-moving world.
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?You shoul 80
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals .Do you agree or disagree with this point of view ? Why or why not ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Some people say that government should break down all the historical buildings and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...of 3,287 deaths in a day. Besides this, a large number of vehicles tend to create pollution, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to be promoted to solve this matter. To commence with, trains tend to have hi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75019809869 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8155744393 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.333333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1111111111 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251160162035 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910387285164 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616857539596 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14188304936 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408955782937 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.