Government should spend more money for the construction in railways rather than in roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give examples and evidences to support your position.
government supposed to funding railroads constructing rather than highways. To some measure, I agree with the idea. However, I also believe that finance road development is also important.
On the one hand, developing railways is economically beneficial as well as safe for the community due to the fact that it could provide low-cost transportation. The train ticket for 100 Kilometers of distance, for example, is cost just about 100.000 Indonesian Rupiah, compares to other modes of transportation expense such as buses or taxis, it just about a half of the ticket price. Furthermore, the traffic accident rarely happens in on the train. As a result, by funding the construction of railroads, the government not only provides low-fare public transportation but also offer safety for the travelers.
On the other hand, the geographical factors are worth to consider in term of development of transportation facilities such as railroads. For the country such as Indonesia, the geographical surface is should be taken into account because of train system could not be used as a public transportation due to it located in mountain areas. Therefore, the development of roads is preferable compares to railways. Moreover, by funding the highways the government could save a large amount of money since the vehicles are not provided by the government but it is afforded by the citizens. As a result, the government could save large amount of money and spending it for the other purpose.
To conclude, I think both railways and highways essential to be funded by the government as long as economic and geographical are taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | wardiati | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | apath lawjarp | 56 | view |
- The carts below give the information about workforce composition in the UK and about average hourly earnings 92
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford.What are the reasons for this behaviour?What actions can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
government supposed to funding railroads construct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... as Indonesia, the geographical surface is should be taken into account because of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26893939394 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17444808403 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518939393939 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7404169597 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15266306949 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568620801534 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544229095078 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921380226901 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245869876193 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.