It is argued that retirees should be looked after and receive financial resources from the government. Others, however, hold the thought that people should save a portion of their income to have a nest-egg in their retirement. Personally, I believe that both measures should be adopted as each one has its own benefits.
Admittedly, the provision of state monetary and health-care support to the elder after their retirement is associated with a host of merits. The key argument here is that in their seventies or eighties, the elderly are unlikely to take good care of themselves, especially those who are susceptible to chronic diseases. Therefore, by providing old people with excellent medical care including high-quality rest-home or convalescent home, government are able to ensure the health of these citizens, which ultimately boosts the social welfare. Granted, one might argue that the responsibility of fulfilling old people’s well-being lies fully with their children or grandchildren. However, this line of reasoning is not sound since they have already been occupied by a huge amount of workload at school or workplace. In addition, there are colossal retirees whose pension is far from enough to afford their medical bills, house rents and monthly grocery. Hence, it is vital that financial resources should be allocated to these individuals to subsist their lives.
However, it is imprudent to downplay the importance of the culture of saving of workers to support their retirement. Since savings-oriented people are not dependent on the state for their living expenses, this may instill a sense of self-respect and confidence in them. To be specific, those who are reliant on the government’s funding are faced with negative societal stigma, which ultimately makes them feel inferior to their counterparts. Furthermore, having saving account to assist one’s retirement is beneficial to the overall economic development of a country. In other words, if individuals were able to accumulate money for their own pension age, it would lessen the financial burden on the state. Hence, this allows government to focus on allotting resources to more efficacious purposes such as education, medication or agriculture.
In conclusion, while the provision of state monetary support is essential to assist retirees in terms of health and financial means, it is vital that people should have saving habits as it benefits both themselves and national development.
- Some people believe that government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire Others say individual should save during their working years to fund their own retirement What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer 78
- Some people believe that the government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire Others say individuals should save during their working years to fund their own retirement What is your opinion 78
- Some people believe that the government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire Others say individuals should save during their working years to fund their own retirement What is your opinion 78
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44155844156 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00886417432 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561038961039 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.977957548 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.235294118 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803584277683 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271301151418 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026600625964 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530001453047 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00304785237225 0.056905535591 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.