Government should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that authorities should spend a large expenditure of funds for improving and building railways rather than making better road systems. In my point of view, transportation should be balanced between roads and railways.
There is no doubt that there are a lot of advantages that railways bring to people. Firstly, trains are safer than private vehicles because they ride on railways, this means that there are no other means of transport traveling on it, leading to significantly decrease the rate of accidents than cars, buses which are driven on roads. Secondly, it is also a powerful tool for addressing overpopulation in urban areas. For instance, citizens can live in their village instead of migrating to metropolitan areas by using speed trains. Last but not least, most modern trains are operated by electricity which is environmentally friendly in comparison to private vehicles producing exhaust fumes that are harmful for people’s health and can cause some diseases related to lungs.
Nevertheless, no one can get door-to-door access to their final destination only by using railways. It is known that, once you get off from a train either you have to walk a little further or take a taxi to reach the point, hence, the roads are necessary and should connect each endpoint. In other words, they are ideal for short distances where trains can not be used. Moreover, roads are considered to be the lifeline of a country. With regards to allocating budgets to roads, one of the key reasons for this is that constructing and maintaining roads will solve the problem of traffic jams resulted from the mass-production of vehicles as well as boost road safety because every individual prefers to have their own car or bikes for their traveling purpose which leads to an enhancement in traffic congestion.
To sum up, I firmly believe that allocating funds and developing only the railway network is not the solution. The development of road networks as well as the trainline should also be equally considered to build excellent transportation infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-07 | 123456abcxyz | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt in traffic congestion. To sum up, I firmly believe that allocating funds a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, no doubt, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13823529412 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93046726791 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.9724683031 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.785714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15847621747 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523720709199 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551352637367 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106977723356 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613116763486 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.