Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Transportation is a vital sector which requires continuously maintenance so as to facilitate other areas, including trading and commercial. Regarding that, a question arises as to whether government shall concentrate on upgrading the railway system instead of the roadway. In my point of view, government should allot budget to build a sustainable railroad.
Railways are public transportation. Not only it is able to carry massive frights but also a mean of commute. In crowded metropolitans like Shanghai, Delhi, intercity rails and metro routes have been installed into the city infrastructure to enhance the civilians daily commute, and this has proved to be efficient to the inhabitants. These railways employ advance technology with environmental friendly fuel, which has minimal environment impact, improve passenger/cargo capacity, and economical transportation for underpaid workers. Besides, travelling by trains are generally faster, as the speed of the metro can be up to 100 kilometers per hour. Furthermore, due to the
By contrast, although roadways provides commuters a more personal experience with a variety choices of vehicle like bus, bike, car, to name a few, it easily causes traffic jam during peak working hours. Additionally, the more transports on the road, the more pollutant emits into the air, which gradually damages the environment. That is not to mention the notorious noise from such vehicles, and unprecedented hike in petrol and diesel price. Therefore, if invest in railways, the number of road transport would decrease, further avoiding crew and detrimental road accidents.
For all of the reasons above, I draw a conclusion that is commuting by train is far more efficient and inexpensive for civilians, so I concur with the idea that authorities should allocate budget to railways.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...which requires continuously maintenance so as to facilitate other areas, including tradi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ial. Regarding that, a question arises as to whether government shall concentrate on upgradi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meters per hour. Furthermore, due to the By contrast, although roadways provides ...
^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in petrol and diesel price. Therefore, if invest in railways, the number of roa...
^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...w and detrimental road accidents. For all of the reasons above, I draw a conclusion that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19037935176 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689285714286 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7414149975 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116595069579 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378113527291 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309821050229 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636635872372 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130094988994 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...which requires continuously maintenance so as to facilitate other areas, including tradi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ial. Regarding that, a question arises as to whether government shall concentrate on upgradi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meters per hour. Furthermore, due to the By contrast, although roadways provides ...
^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in petrol and diesel price. Therefore, if invest in railways, the number of roa...
^^
Line 4, column 5, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...w and detrimental road accidents. For all of the reasons above, I draw a conclusion that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19037935176 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689285714286 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7414149975 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116595069579 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378113527291 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309821050229 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636635872372 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130094988994 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.