Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
It is often argue that it is more advantageous to improve rail road even there are required so much budget. I completely agree with this opinion and think that rail road is crucial than bypass.
First of all, I believe that developing rail road can gives efficient result that cannot guarantee road. If nations support their railway, it would affect air quality that causes plenty of disease by encouraging people’s train usage. Also, going train on the rail road is safety than by driving car. For example, if people go to distance place that is required long time, train is fitting and safe vehicle because you can sleep and relax during the way. That is why it is more important to support the way that can gives more safety and reduce to expose disease.
Secondly, it is beneficial for country’s economy that is critical rate for the nations because train is faster compared with car. Therefore, it would allow to people who come and arrive where they want to go as well as nations shipment would rapidly come to destination that is connected economic communication. For example, this method is convenient for Mongolia because there is no high way that is used by car. Since Mongolian territory is so big that is approximately 1500 m3, thus it is too difficult that local shipment and transportation deal with the road. Developing rail way is more convenient in the Mongolia.
To conclude, I strongly believe that improving railroad is more beneficial than the road because it can reduce air pollution and affect human health and yield economic.
- Some people say that only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country. Others say that there are not the only reason why someone should learn a foreign language. 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purpose in six areas of the world. 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste form home is recycled. They say that The only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think law are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is often argue that it is more advant...
^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...I believe that developing rail road can gives efficient result that cannot guarantee ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...annot guarantee road. If nations support their railway, it would affect air quali...
^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...red with car. Therefore, it would allow to people who come and arrive where they want to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91320754717 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64852437808 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535849056604 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0290146911 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.153846154 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.037762331059 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0161721522447 0.084324248473 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246675865006 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0291284552887 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170166892849 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.