Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

According to some people, the authorities should spend more money for railways than roads. I completely disagree with this point of view and I believe government should spend balanced property for both railways and roads.
There are some reasons for support this idea. First of all, trains are very comfortable and safe than buses and cars, so passengers who travel long distance can enjoy their time in train. Secondly, train tickets are cheap in all states and this type of transport very ecofriend. Trains do not emit any gases that pollute air and it consumes much less fuel than the number of passengers. In addition the trains run in an orderly style that goes on time and arrives on time. And this is reliable for business people and can save every passenger’s valuable time. Trains also do not depend on weather and can go every season.
On the other hand, roads have importance and value as the same as railways. The construction of railway could not built in every geographical places such as mountains. Then people have to use private cars or public buses for reach their destination. Moreover, roads are needed in cities because there are no place for railway and station. For example people take a taxi and buses for reach their college or job and others use both railways and roads. Lastly, governments and individuals need roads in default situations that reach long distance in a short time.
As I have said, governments should spend equal money both railways and roads. Choosing the type of road depend on passengers situation and mind.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... fuel than the number of passengers. In addition the trains run in an orderly style that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an orderly style" with adverb for "orderly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... passengers. In addition the trains run in an orderly style that goes on time and arrives on time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
Suggestion: build
.... The construction of railway could not built in every geographical places such as mo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passengers'' or 'passenger's'?
Suggestion: passengers'; passenger's
...ds. Choosing the type of road depend on passengers situation and mind.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epend on passengers situation and mind.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88301886792 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.463188578 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3639772412 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1176470588 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233880851136 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780005306784 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799343109512 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174589343823 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992718353955 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.