Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars

It is true that the almost half of the world family have a private car. As a result, world’s big cities population suffer from traffic congestions. I believe there are several reason and solutions that government should do for this issue.
Perhaps, the major cause for this effect is cost of cars affordable and it is easy to get car. In fact that car companies produce and release a high number of cars while governments do not provide infrastructure like big roads. Another reason for the growth of traffic jams is people do not want to use public transport in order to this they use private cars. For example, some rich man think public transport unsafe for young generation and they hire private driver for their children.
Turning to possible solutions, governments should provide good infrastructure for reduce big traffic jams. Today most of population live in a big cities and there are not enough highways. Second way to reduce congestions, is high taxes for private cars and high costs of new cars. Some workers save enough money for new private transport in a short period, in order to they can take public transport like buses and trains. Finally, it is very effective way for governments to impose a production limit on car manufacturing market with cars, people can not purchase high number of cars.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for traffic congestions in big cities and steps need to be taken to tackle this problem.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...a private car. As a result, world’s big cities population suffer from traffic congesti...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...affic congestions. I believe there are several reason and solutions that government should do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84462151394 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61083573416 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5860064247 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5384615385 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231063437642 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952018036872 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417268807662 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15520960809 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500807740824 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.