The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line chart compares the figure of daily passengers who travel by three different forms of transport in the UK from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, the UK commuters prefer using the car to going by bus and train, and bus passengers tend to decrease in 60 years.
Between 1970 and 2015, there was a dramatic increase in the number of car commuters from around 5 to 7 million. In this time, although the figure of bus users was nearly double the number of train passengers which was around 2 million (1970), the figure of bus users reduced slowly to the same number of train commuters which was 3.5 million (2015).
In 2030, car users are expected to grow continuously to reach a peak of 9 million. While the number of train passengers is predicted to climb quickly to just below 5 million (2030), it is anticipated that the figure of the bus commuters will decrease slightly to the number which is less than three times the number of car users (2030).
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 87
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 73
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 78
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssengers tend to decrease in 60 years. Between 1970 and 2015, there was a drama...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 1615.20841683 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 171.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53801169591 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37995171632 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 176.041082164 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 506.74238477 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9852275449 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315543545853 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170355075174 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538858894608 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193429968155 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387997083584 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 78.4519038076 29% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.