Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people suppose that university should only teach subjects that will be helpful for their students such as science and technology, others believe that students have the right to decide what subject which they want to learn. In my opinion, I agree with the second statement.
On the one hand, we can not refuse the important role of students in science and technology. Firstly, they give knowledge that will help learners to confront with the innovative challenges in the modern world. Therefore, students can acquire several crucial positions in the workplace if they comprehend these subjects. Secondly, a majority of companies not only inside the country but also all around the world always need technical and scientific their employees’ knowledge. For example, Japan recruited more than 5000 workers, who graduated from Vietnam’s universities, had experience in the field of information technology in 2015.
On the other hand, students will gain more other useful knowledge if they have the right to learn what they like. In the academic side, for instance, learners want to study the history which equips them several important periods of the past and distinguish not only the culture but also the custom between two nations. Therefore, they will not experience shock culture feelings when they go abroad. Besides, several learners also keen on studying foreign languages which help them broaden not only the knowledge but also the relationship around the world.
In conclusion, while subjects such as science and technology always have a good role in the future, in my viewpoint, I totally agree that students should study whatever they like.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- The pie charts compare the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets namely an average diet a healthy diet and a healthy diet for sport 71
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 73
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3320754717 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70164434456 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.645963594 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5833333333 7.06120827912 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363885182688 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119025434056 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115163591656 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236657501854 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879593645804 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.