The line graph illustrates the percentage of people who have gone
through adolescence usually do in their free time in United States from
1980 to 2010.
What stands out from the graph is that almost the trends of
things that people spend time on increases in the early years except for
going to the theatre. Until the last year, hiking is the thing that took the
highest position compared to the rest of the things.
Looking at the graph for more details, it can be seen that the rates
of older adults who watch tv in their free time peaked at 60% in the
1980s, then it continued to rise to 70% over the next 20 year. However,
the number of people watching TV dropped slightly to about 65% in
2010s. There was a grow considerable to more than 10% in the number
of adults surfing the Internet in the 20 years first, which was followed
by a huge upsurge to 50% in 2010s. In addition, a rapid bounce from
20% to the highest point was witnessed in the ratio of people who
usually go hiking between 1980s and 2010s.
Besides, starting at 30% in 1980s, the proportion of older adults
who often reading in their free time leaped moderately to 40% after 10
years. Over the next 10 years, the number of people reading books
plummeted noticeably by 20%, but later this figure jumped enormously
to 60% in the last year. The rate of people who usually go to the theatre
experienced a marked plunge to 30% in the year 1990s. Nevertheless,
the number of people going to the theatre is increasing, so this rate has
taken off significantly to more than 40% until the last year.
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 64, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...tching TV dropped slightly to about 65% in 2010s. There was a grow considerable to more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 18, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ghtly to about 65% in 2010s. There was a grow considerable to more than 10% in the nu...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 26, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
... was followed by a huge upsurge to 50% in 2010s. In addition, a rapid bounce from 20% ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 26, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...0s and 2010s. Besides, starting at 30% in 1980s, the proportion of older adults who of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57986111111 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30927316992 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.7529200844 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140267437011 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586450496225 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063285998475 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377532996133 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445195337356 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.