The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make relevant comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the number of store which were set up and others those shut down in a particular country from the year 2011 to 2018.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that both the opening and closure rates experienced a declining trend with significant fluctuation during the said period.
To begin with, closures registered at around 6500 in 2011, which was less than that of store openings. Howerver, the figure fell slightly and reached 6000 in 2012. Turning to the next two years, there are over 7000 closures in 2013 before decreasing to approximately 6600 in 2014. Interestingly, the year 2015 witnessed dramatic drop in the number of store that closed, plummeting to just under 1000. After that, there was not any remarkable movement, the closure rate sharply picked up, reaching around 5000 and maintaining that figure until 2018.
To continue, in the initial year, 8500 shops had been opened, which was the peak point in the given period and higher than the 6200 closures. Over the next three years, the number of openings reduce to a low of 4000 but gradually recovered to 6100 in 2014, almost the same level as closures. Howbeit, a decline was observed in 2015 and the numbers remained steady for the following three years, at around 4000 shops per year. Withal, as a result of a downward trend, the rate of new store openings reaching 3000 in 2018, emerging as the low point of the two categories.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-07 tran quynh 56 view
Essays by user tran quynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the number of...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86290322581 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51518541032 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8796483987 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135397301584 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489704454759 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408525804135 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830360508254 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525088895652 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.