The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the expenditure on books in four different countries from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that spending on books increased in each country during the decade, with the biggest rise taking place in Austria. However, Germany was the biggest consumer of books in each year.
In 1995, $80 million were spent on books in German. The equivalent figures for France and Italy were lower, at $55 million and $50 million each. In contrast, expenses on book were lowest in Austria with only $30 million, which remained under $40 million until 2001.
Between 2001 and 2005, the amount of money used for books by people in Austria saw a dramatic rise of nearly $30 million, which overtook Italy in 2003 as the third biggest book consumer. By 2005, expenditure on books continued to be the highest in Germany, with figures reaching under $100 million. The spending figures for France and Austria were similar at around $67 each, while spending on books in Itay saw a small rise to just over $60 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | yuantanwei | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.https://www.ielts-exam.net/images/graphs/IELTS_Writing_Task_1_15 67
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 1615.20841683 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 176.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36876628628 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5137107006 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184800502309 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921993799232 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585355866554 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118762640591 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447658743235 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 78.4519038076 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.