Great men are always willing to be little. To what extent you agree or disagree?
History has provided us with many great men. Greatness is an ability to put principles, humanity and other people's interests ahead of yours. It is fully agreed that men of high moral stature are always willing to undermine their self interest in favor of getting something greater for their people. The role of this attitude in their struggle for equal rights, principles, humanitarian gains and freedom shall be discussed in this essay.
World always respects and remembers those great personalities who fight for equal rights for all humanity, with no exception of race and color. Nelson Mandela was one example of such great individual, during 20th century. He did not blink twice before sacrificing his own basic life luxuries to get rights for his fellow men. He like the great leaders, endured multiple hardships during his journey and was kept locked up in a cell for many years in his struggle to get black men the same rights as the white, in South Africa. This clearly shows that great men do not think about their personal lives or gains and can lower themselves to life in jail for their people.
Similarly, fighting for freedom of one's people from tyrannical rule is also considered a great service and suffering of a leader for this greater purpose is always considered legendary. De Lai Lama of Tibet is a living example of such great leaders and is a great leader of this 21st century. He suffered physical and mental torture from the Chinese just for making his people aware of their subservient role in the region and creating a movement of freedom from the imposed occupation of their land by china. He, just like Nelson Mandela, was put in jail but was also forced to leave his country and take shelter in India but he continued to pursue his goal of Tibet freedom. This demonstrates and proves our point that great leaders can go to the great extent of exile to save and help their people.
All in all, great people do not think about themselves while acting in the interest of their people. That is what differentiates them from dictators and rulers. In my opinion great men do not consider themselves as a single entity and devote themselves for the greater good of humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | Farhankhan54 | 87 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today.What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
- Great men are always willing to be little To what extent you agree or disagree 87
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems.Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 73
- In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is decreasing. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem? 73
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think it is good for the country while others believe that the government should control the salaries and limit the amount that people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opin 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... Similarly, fighting for freedom of ones people from tyrannical rule is also con...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78534031414 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45155914998 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531413612565 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2604332196 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94117647059 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178916402232 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649621238418 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400323067451 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117067778142 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346149257908 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.