In recent years, there have been two opposing views on whether animals could be killed by people. Some claim that animal exploitation is morally reprehensible whereas others consider this long-held practice should continue to meet the basic needs of human beings. In my opinion, whether animals can be sacrificed depends on the purpose of using them.
On the one hand, some animal advocates assert that animals have the same rights as people. For instance, animals, just like humans, also experience pain and fear. People will scream in discomfort if someone grabs their hair from behind. Likewise, the living geese will definitely suffer tremendous agony as their feathers are ripped out for the down jackets that people wear during the winter. Unfortunately, most people take this cruelty for granted, not knowing that their inhuman mentality has violated the animal rights to live healthily and happily.
On the other hand, others have no scruples about slaughtering animals since they might be used for something that benefits people. For example, all approved vaccines are tested by animals such as mice and dogs. If the government does not get vaccines strictly examined through animal experiments, it can never guarantee their safety and effectiveness, and therefore children’s health will be jeopardized. In addition, meat is the major access to receiving protein that everyone needs every day. If no animals are killed, people will no longer get enough nutrition.
In my opinion, the issue of whether animals could be exploited is completely contingent upon how we use them. For instance, if people kill animals for food, it is totally acceptable. Since almost all people consume meat every day, it is necessary to slaughter animals for this demand. Nonetheless, if people abuse animals excessively, the food chain of animals will be destroyed. Afterwards, the balance of nature will be disturbed because of the disrupted food chain, thereby adversely affecting human lives.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that sacrificing animals is tolerable on the condition that we properly use them to maximize people’s overall benefits.
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 84
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 56
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 67
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31609195402 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67711858755 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9258017596 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3684210526 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398302431116 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121904590812 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577818906005 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217097572397 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496941620283 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31609195402 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67711858755 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9258017596 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3684210526 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398302431116 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121904590812 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577818906005 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217097572397 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496941620283 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.