The issue of whether animal abuse is justifiable has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this had turned into a dilemma facing many people. Some claim that animal exploitation should be strictly prohibited, whereas others do not agree. Personally speaking, I would assert that humans have the right to use animals for their own benefits.
The rationality of zero-tolerance towards animal abuse should be recognized for the following reasons. To begin with, animals and humans, just as some animal rights advocates believe, should be treated equally. Despite the fact that animals cannot vocalize their thought, they still have the right to survive. Also, animals, just like humans, feel pain and show fear. For instance, many online videos show that cows would cry before they are slaughtered. They would be even paralyzed with horror when they know their death is impending. However, this does not necessarily mean that animals cannot be exploited by humans.
In fact, animals should be taken advantage of. First and foremost, this is the law of nature that only the fittest can survive. Like fierce predators, humans are standing at the top of the food chain, and they need to eat weaker animals to acquire nutrition. If people do not eat meat, they will suffer malnutrition even get sick. Moreover, animals can use in different scientific and medical experiment. Although some animal rights advocates protest that this exploitation is not only inhumane but also cruel, this can ensure human health. For instance, with the sacrifice of mice and monkeys, scientists will never develop vaccines against life-threatening diseases.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that animals should be used by humans, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest. Hence, it is worth sacrificing some animals for the overall well-being of human beings.
- ONLINE LEARNING IS GOOD AS FACE TO FACE LEARNING DO YOU AGREE 95
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 93
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 92
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20779220779 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61556152378 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5412055164 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4210526316 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394313870697 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120642868924 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691674614857 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249314355242 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115289202403 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.