Over the past few decades, there has been a widespread debate over whether animals can be exploited to benefit human beings. This discussion has led to two divergent views on this ethical issue. Some animal advocates insist that the exploitation of animals should be strictly prohibited whereas others consider it morally acceptable to utilize animals to meet human needs for food and medical research. In my opinion, I agree with those who harbor the views of using animals for our own benefits as humans are the world’s most dominant species.
There is a growing trend towards zero-tolerance for animal exploitation because some people contend that animals should have a basic right to respectful treatment. For these enthusiastic supporters of animal rights, animals and human beings are alike in many ways; they both feel, think, behave, and particularly experience agony in the same ways in which humans do. For instance, there is sufficient evidence that some cows shed tears of horror before they are slaughtered in the shambles. Despite the impossibility of animals to vocalize their preferences and choices, their basic right should never be compromised; instead, they should be treated with the same respect as human beings.
On the other hand, other people assert that animals should be used to maximize human benefits, for human beings are the most important creature on the planet. Besides, everything must be done to ensure their survival. For example, animals play a vital role in stabilizing food supplies and providing vitamins that people cannot obtain from plants. In many countries, cows and horses are needed by farmers to assist them in plowing their agricultural fields to prevent weeds from growing. Without the aid and sacrifice of these animals, the world would lack adequate access to food, which in turn gives rise to widespread malnutrition, famine and death.
To recapitulate, people hold different perspectives on the justification of using animals for human needs. Some claim it is morally wrong to exploit animals while others take this act for granted. As for me, since the survival of human beings is partially dependent upon animals, it is completely reasonable to continue this long-held practice.
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of holidays in a year or people doing different jobs enjoy different amount of holiday time To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respon 92
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, thus, whereas, while, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28291316527 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72436865349 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.765667816 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478449157937 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1507489212 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107260638269 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288780909483 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602355590762 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.