How will this scholarship contribute to the organization’s human resource development needs?
With the population of 97 million and the government’s open- door policy, Vietnam is a promising destination for investors worldwide, including those coming from Australia. In fact, thanks to the shift in production of multinational companies, Vietnam has been witnessing a significant increase in the foreign investment. Many more plants, facilities and buildings have been constructed in reaction to this increased demand, leading to a tough question: how to deliver those construction projects on time, under budget and with a high quality so that both clients and contractors can have win-win relationships?
It should be acknowledged that the expectation on quality of foreign clients is usually higher than that of local ones. Unfortunately, there are not many Vietnamese contractors can be able to fulfill that requirement, or even if they can, the construction cost will be likely to be higher, meaning that if clients want to have a high- class plant, they have to pay more money or otherwise. What are the main reasons? One of them is the lack of professional managers in construction industry in Vietnam. There has been so many instances of companies winning the tenders by giving cheap offers without knowing if they can meet quality requirements or not, resulting in the breaches of contracts and the losses of not only the contractors themselves but also the clients. It is true that the delay of a plant can directly affect the production, causing unwanted results for client, such as the loss of profit or even the loss of reputation. This is just one of many examples of wrong decisions made by project managers of construction companies from the very beginning.
By taking Construction Management Course offered by AAS then becoming a qualified project manager, I believe that I can contribute to the development of not only this industry but also the economy as a whole, bringing the benefit to both clients and contractors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-30 | Trâm Nguyễn | 11 | view |
- 1 How will this scholarship contribute to the organization s human resource development needs
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- How will this scholarship contribute to the organization s human resource development needs 11
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15141955836 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07551402758 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9757069437 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631909357076 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0205824148314 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032618952568 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556413415921 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353416713937 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.