In this day and age, personal actions bring numerous adverse influences to fauna and flora species. It is argued that it is pointless to solve this issue while others believe that there are several solutions to such a problem. This essay will discuss both views of this situation and I strongly support the latter.
On the one hand, some people hold the belief that there is no way to limit the harmful effects on animals and plants. In particular, more and more species are vanishing because of deforestation for agriculture. Even if humans bring them back into the ecosystem, there are no places for them to exist. In addition, illegal hunting has been more rampant to serve for different purposes such as fashion, medicine or even entertainment. This has contributed to bringing these creatures to the brink of extinction. For example, by killing rhinos for their horns, Javan rhinos have been disappearing in Vietnam since 2011.
On the other hand, I believe that some practical actions should be adopted to prevent negative consequences of human activities on fauna and flora species. Firstly, government should impose severe punishments on crimes who illegal wildlife trade and animals killing likely imprisonment or death penalty. Furthermore, authorities should cooperate to tackle deforestation which is one of the main culprits for the extinction of some species. This is to preserve the world's rapidly decreasing forest area as well as the habitats of animals. In terms of individuals, people can raise their awareness of the heavy effects of our activities on creatures. If parents teach their children about these consequences, it will be helpful to educate children what they should do to minimize the detrimental impact on plants and animals.
In conclusion, I strongly emphasize that there are various methods to mitigate the damage caused by human activities to the species of animals and plants. By resolving the deforestation problem, applying stricter penalties and increasing awareness, the situation can be addressed.
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in sociely such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 78
- Nowadays it is very popular to be technology internet literate Some people say that these skills will replace the use of books as main source of information and entertainment Do you agree or disagree 100
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that it would be a waste of money 84
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a illegal'.
Suggestion: who is a illegal
...uld impose severe punishments on crimes who illegal wildlife trade and animals killing like...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29230769231 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86502021431 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0668785965 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.176470588 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299390612399 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811615681557 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635149322107 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163849416379 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046233472403 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.