Humans tend to copy one another, especially in fashion, choice of clothes and consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree? Provide your view and examples from your own experience.
There is no denying the fact that people follow others more particularly in fashion, clothing, and even choice of products. I agree with this statement because of two main reasons; appealing and superiority and will elaborate my opinion in looming paragraphs.
The first and foremost, people find other's choice more appealing than own and persuade to buy the same whether in terms of glamour, fabric choice or other products. While people see someone in new clothes, they wish to obtain the same because of colour, quality or other factors. However, every person has different personality and it is not true if something is looking attractive on others that will appear same on everyone. For instance, many girls follow the fashion sense followed by famous actresses to look gorgeous. Therefore, people are in the habit of following others to look like others.
Furthermore, the other factor which contribute is to show superiority among others. Although people have everything but still want to get the things other's have in order to feel self-satisfaction. When people find they cannot afford the similar things, it creates some serious repercussions such as stress and inferiority complex. For example, due to materialistic approach of people, they are more towards of getting same other's own. As a result, the feeling of showoff attracts people to acquire the things other's belong.
To conclude, it is undeniable to say that nowadays the approach of following others in clothes, fashion, and products is raising. As reasons are discussed in above paragraphs, I reckon people follow others to look attractive and superior among others.
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- You have received a bill from a mobile phone company for international call charges relating to a time when you did not use your phone for international call Write a letter to company Complaining about this Giving your reasons Asking for bill to be change 80
- write a letter to an organizer about the hotel you stayed who booked the hotel for you meeting details What you did not like about the hotel what you want organizer to do
- You had just missed a friend s party white a letter apologizing and stating reasons why you could not attend the party ask how fun was it
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'buying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'persuade' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: buying
...ce more appealing than own and persuade to buy the same whether in terms of glamour fa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of following others to look like others Furthermore the other factor which contr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ollowing others to look like others Furthermore the other factor which contribute is to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook attractive and superior among others
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15209125475 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63192587031 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 263.0 20.2975951904 1296% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1355.0 106.682146367 1270% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 263.0 20.7667163134 1266% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 130.0 7.06120827912 1841% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0579272023141 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579272023141 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464755732635 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222790998815 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.3 13.0946893788 1026% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -195.47 50.2224549098 -389% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 105.9 11.3001002004 937% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.07 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.22 8.58950901804 235% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 107.2 10.1190380762 1059% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.7795591182 510% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.