If we want to save the future of the planet, we will have to drastically change our way of life. What is your opinion?
It is undeniable that the way we live in this modern age has a significant impact on our earth. Therefore, we need to make urgent changes to secure the bright future of our next generation. However, some people think catastrophic events are still too early to happen. I completely agree with the idea and, in this essay, I will support my view with some examples.
Firstly, humankind is following practices that lead to the pollution of air, water, and soil. They are rooted in the extreme manufacturing rates in factories, increasing number of vehicles, and cutting of trees rapidly around the world. As a result, it is just a matter of time before natural disasters, climate changes, and fatal diseases storm into our beloved planet. That is also why many geographic and climate experts are firmly proposing changing to healthy energy usage.
Another reason why I agree with this is that we have been depleting precious natural resources significantly in the last 3 to 4 decades. Since, we need to adopt a new eco-friendly lifestyle on time by reducing the carbon footprint, reserving more renewable energy, recycling waste products effectively, and so on. By doing so, the sustainability and safety of our environment will be improved eventually.
On the other hand, immediate implementations demand a concerted effort and time from each government, community, and organization. What’s more, we need to make certain adaptations to start an entirely different life. However, we should not underestimate the potentially harmful effects on our planet.
In conclusion, the threat to the safety of our globe is often overlooked nowadays. In particular, we should rely on advancing technology, limit energy usage and perform changes as an individual in order to save the planet. Personally, we should drastically change our way of life before it becomes too late.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun geographic seems to be countable; consider using: 'many geographics'.
Suggestion: many geographics
...to our beloved planet. That is also why many geographic and climate experts are firmly proposin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe before it becomes too late.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26821192053 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00534040698 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639072847682 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.678705292 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5882352941 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355673873503 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963179998728 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903320860536 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175954264442 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847571472671 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.