Increase in the production of consumer goods result in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is true that the growth in producing consumer goods can have a consequence of environmental degradation. This problem can be distributed/attributable to a host of reasons/factors and should be tackled by numerous solutions.
There are many ways in which the expanding production of consumer goods can be harmful for/do great harm to the environment. Firstly, many enterprises have been depleting natural resource in an attempt to expand their business operation and maximize profit. In the process of producing goods, the incineration of coal, oil and natural gases emits a substantial volume of greenhouse gases. In addition, more and more chemical wastes are disposed directly into water bodies such as rivers, causing death to many kinds of fish as well as other aquatic animals. Finally, the packaging of consumer goods, which is mostly made of plastics, will not totally decompose under the landfill for thousands of years.
To alleviate such environmental problems, there are many actions that should be high on agenda. Regarding energy, it is pressing that governments invest heavily in the development of renewable energy in order to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels. Not only is the use of wind and solar energy economical but also helps to cut down on/curb carbon footprint, a factor that leads to ozone layer depletion. Besides that, companies which discharge toxic waste into water bodies must be held accountable for their actions and be fined strictly. In terms of reducing waste and pollution, more companies should be encouraged to mass-produce bio-degradable packaging at a more reasonable price.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for this problem and measures should be implemented to solve it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | kieuoanh.dau | 73 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The widespread use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Increase in the production of consumer goods result in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case? What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- In many countries, the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happening? What will be the effects of it on the family and society? 73
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consumer goods can have a consequence of environmental degradation. This problem ...
^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...butable to a host of reasons/factors and should be tackled by numerous solutions....
^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olutions. There are many ways in which the expanding production of consumer goo...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... heavily in the development of renewable energy in order to reduce the dependence...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, regarding, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3357400722 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12859992182 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4641226621 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219903830909 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775550440086 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078615721445 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160237702799 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832291413185 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.