Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is sometimes argued that economic growth is the sole measure for the tragedy of world hunger and poverty while the others contend that economic growth has a consequence of environment degradation so it must be stopped. I agree completely with the second view.
On the one hand, starving and poverty can be reduced as a result of economic development. The first reason is that poor people have more chances to get higher paying jobs. They will not only afford the basic necessities of life but also be able to support their families and encourage their offspring to pursue higher education. Secondly, governments will have more resource to allocate in social policies which support those citizen who is in need . For instance, the poor will have opportunities to borrow concessional loan from state budget to earn a living by starting their own businesses.
On the other hand, I strongly agree that economic growth can do great harm to the environment. Firstly, many enterprises have been depleting natural resources in attempt to expand their business operation and maximize profit. In the process of producing goods, the incineration of coal, oil and natural gases emits a substantial volume of greenhouse gases. For instance, the Great Smog in 1952 in London was the primary culprit of 12000 dead. In addition, more and more chemical wastes are disposed directly into water bodies, such as rivers causing death to many kinds of fish as well as other aquatic animals.
In conclusion, economic growth which is not sustainable must be prohibited. If it is not based on meeting human needs rather than generating profits, such growth will threat the survival and prosperity of human by destroying their habitat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people arelosing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In many countries, the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happening? What will be the effects of it on the family and society? 73
- Increase in the production of consumer goods result in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case? What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ing jobs. They will not only afford the basic necessities of life but also be able to support th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... necessities of life but also be able to support their families and encourage the...
^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this citizen' or 'those citizens'?
Suggestion: this citizen; those citizens
...locate in social policies which support those citizen who is in need . For instance, the poor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ich support those citizen who is in need . For instance, the poor will have opport...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71202737074 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7011699935 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219242412443 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726942020577 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105403263203 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15660104414 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121220121611 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.