The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Over the past few years, a prevailing phenomenon of accelerating goods production for consumer’s satisfaction, which takes its toll on the environment. In spite of negative influences resulted from this trend, there are feasible measures to address this problem.
As a matter of fact, there are a few rationales to hold accountable for the mass production which provokes environmental degradation. The first cause is that the upsurge of manufacturing industry could be considered as one of the primary culprits spurring the excessive production of merchandise. In fact, these days, all of these industries have a tendency to avail fossil fuel for producing process, which consequently discharges a large influx of gas emission to the environment. As a result, this is the main culprit of resulting in air contamination leading to detrimental implications for the state of people's health, particularly wrecking their respiratory systems. Another fact is that the trend of growing quickly the population is prone to generate destructive ramifications on the environment. To facilitate human-living conditions, the producers have the attempt to boost the productivity satisfying the consumption of resident in term of essential things. Additionally, this will induce the problem of overusing in citizens leading to throwing-away their product extravagantly that are able to plunge the environment into being ruined.
As far as it is concerned, there are a multitude of efficient approaches to eradicate the aforementioned problems. The first method is to impose a higher tax on the manufacturing commodities. All of these products are also lifted up the cost, which is likely to be subject to the resident’s consideration in opting for a product. This may alleviate the total consumption of human and the number of goods produced in the sense that the adverse trend of spoiling the environment will be mitigated instantly. In other words, the governments should operate a plethora of campaigns to raise the public perception regarding the dire corollaries resulted from the mass production. As a result, this makes a great contribution to putting an end to environmental degradation.
In conclusion, as cited above, though the considerably increasing production of merchandise will pose crippling problems to the environment, there are still plausible effectively solutions to eliminate this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers Would the advantages of this o 73
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 84
- People are living longer Some people think that it causes big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and society in general Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59289617486 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42699309956 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565573770492 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6886711908 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9375 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26295156001 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789810299195 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675311315309 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172964129785 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229256311349 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.