An increase in production of consumers goods result in damage of the natural environment. What are the reasons and possible solutions.
It is undeniable fact is that production of consumer goods are being increased continuously. It has become a major crisis for the natural world. This easy intends to know what are the reasons behind the causes of this phenomenon and what should be do to crub this menace and my personal opinion of this matter.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why companies are producing goods at an alarming rate. The mammoth recognisable fact is that burgeoning population consecutive with many needs has made companies to escalate production of goods. In order to produce goods companies utilie natural resources at an excessive rate, which in turn create adverse impact on natural environment. In addition, people tend to prefer modular design of products which are also causes of more goods product. For example, a recent survey has been carried out that in many Asian countries, owing to the misuse of natural resources by companies, pollution has become a threat.
Nevertheless, such obstacles can overcome with the help of effective initiative. On the top that, government can a significant role to mitigate these issues. To ensure government need to make a strict law against companies which are misusing resources to produce goods. Consecutively, companies will be under a supervision of government, and will never cross their boundaries. moreover, masses should be aware and responsible related to use of goods. Such essential methods may prove beneficial to overcome problems and natural resources could be preserved.
To sum up, albeit goods are imperative parts of daily life, production of goods should be done by retaining all important things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Veet ganger | 78 | view |
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Prison is the best way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people a better education. Do you agree or disagree. 61
- An increase in production of consumers goods result in damage of the natural environment. What are the reasons and possible solutions. 78
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part time jobs and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Dicuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. Other think that money should be spent on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'done'?
Suggestion: done
...s of this phenomenon and what should be do to crub this menace and my personal opi...
^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...should be do to crub this menace and my personal opinion of this matter. To embark with, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... products which are also causes of more goods product. For example, a recent survey h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... and will never cross their boundaries. moreover, masses should be aware and responsible...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26217228464 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86356470251 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2380037981 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220885551131 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668033333186 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719885886115 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125318337083 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716321930873 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.