The increase in tourism is causing environmental problems. What problems has tourism brought to the environment? What can be done to solve these problems?
Because of the rise in tourism, environmental issues are increasing. While these problems are causing severe damage to the environment, there are a number of solutions that could help mitigate these issues.
With regards to the problems, the increasing influx of tourists leaves a great amount of litter that cannot be processed and recycled in a timely manner. Take the beaches of Dahab, as an example. During summer times, tourists’ plastic litter is disposed on the beaches and in the sea, which in turn destroys the marine life and the Red Sea corals. Additionally, this increasing influx of tourists adds stress to transportation systems, whether it is air, rail, or land transportation. This results in more carbon pollution as more fuel is consumed, which effectively contributes to global warming.
Turning to the solutions, it can be argued that the government can play a major role in enforcing them. Firstly, the government can impose severe fines on those who pollute the environment such as the beaches for instance. This may deter the tourists from disposing their garbage on the beaches. Secondly, the government can spread awareness about the impact of environmental damage caused by the tourists. This will help tourists understand the consequences of their damaging behavior, and thus prevent them from pursuing it further. Finally, in extreme cases, the government can resort to regulating the influx of tourists themselves in order to relieve stress added on transportation during peak seasons. Therefore, this can help in decreasing the carbon pollution caused by excessive fuel consumption.
In conclusion, tourism plays a big role in polluting the environment because of excess wastes and carbon pollution; however, government regulations and education can help in saving the environment from further damage.
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 84
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can ba taken to tackle this problem? 56
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r that cannot be processed and recycled in a timely manner. Take the beaches of Dahab, as an examp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00774913245 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6637499003 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193154890454 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622727086225 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599126213653 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131284393329 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749746813964 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.