The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The table provides information about the workforce in silk production in two countries, England and Wales, over a period of 50 years starting from 1851.
It is clear that the total number of silk workers in the two countries declined over the period shown, and that significantly more women were employed than men in this industry. Also, the number of silk manufacturing factories increased over the 50 year period, despite fluctuations.
In 1851, the silk workforce was largest with 130,750 people, including 76,786 females and nearly 54,000 males. In contrast, there was the lowest number of silk factories, with only 272 factories, in 1851. However, ten years later, the number of silk manufacturers reached 761, nearly triple that of the first year while the total number of employees experienced a significant fall of over 20,000 people.
Over the following 41 years, the total number of female and male workers decreased gradually throughout the period, to 25,567 and 13,375 respectively, which contributed to the drop in the total number of employees at 38,942 in 1901. Meanwhile, there was a slight decrease in the figure for factories, which was down to 623 by the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | songuyen14 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | tuonglinh | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
- There are fewer controls on the designs and construction of home and office buildings. So people can build them whatever they like.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can ba taken to tackle this problem? 56
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13265306122 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75069564485 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1957360362 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187787676288 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809652699229 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503947899975 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113668520952 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342041311855 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.