The bar chart below shows the number of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.
The presented bar chart delineates how many people of both genders participating in numerous lectures in the evening at an adult education center during 2009, whereas the provided pre chart highlights data concerning attender’s ages of these courses.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that most females participating in the language course while the majority of men lean towards joining the painting lecture. It is also noticeable that most of the participants are over 50 years old.
Looking at the bar chart, it is clear that the language lecture had 40 female members which were twice as many as the number of male attendees at the same course. The figure for women joining drama class was 20 members which were also twice as many as male attenders. Most of the men were attending the painting lesson with 25 members. However, it is still not as many as the number of women (30 members) joining the same course. The sculpture course had the least member to join with only 10 male participants and 5 female attendees and it was also the only lecture that had more men than women.
In the pie chart, we can see that 42% of the attendees were over 50 years old. By contrast, the courses just had 5% of participants who were under 20 years old. The proportion of the members attending courses in three age groups 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 were 11%, 16%, and 26% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79012345679 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58327412813 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534979423868 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7971532791 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.818181818 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314919273949 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112289763279 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773254555916 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195296087107 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832876043263 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.