Increases in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is clear that customers have tended to demand more goods, which leads to environmental degradation. While this trend is attributable to some reasons, it can be alleviated in some ways.
On the one hand, there are two primary reasons why an increasing trend of producing household products obviously have to occurs. One reason is that we have had to cope with an unprecedented population explosion, which clearly makes an increased productivity from suppliers to satisfy the large number of buyers. Enormous markets like China and India are places which many companies desire to break into thanks to their size of population. Consequently, such areas are motion to increase productivity and grow a business. Another reason comes from technological breakthroughs, which help manufacturing to dramatically rise. For instance, it is undoubted that automatic manufacturing lines that present more ubiquitously in many different kinds of sectors such as assembling cars or computers make production of goods become more effective and faster.
On the other hand, the negative impacts of this trend can be taken over by some initiatives. Firstly, susceptible resources should be widely used to alleviate environmental problems. For example, producers can reduce the reliance on machines operated by fossil fuel if they use alternative energy sources such as hydroelectricity or solar power instead. Secondly, governments should adopt related rigorous disciplines to regulate depletion of natural resources stemmed from intensive industrial processes. For instance, separating waste originally and recycling, which are two important methods to save finite resources should be high on government agenda.
In conclusion, while the productivity growth of producing goods is inevitable due to population explosion and technological development, I think that we have many solutions to control its negative influences through legislation and material revolutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the diagram below show how sand dunes are formed 62
- the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'occur'.
Suggestion: occur
...ng household products obviously have to occurs. One reason is that we have had to cope...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lines that present more ubiquitously in many different kinds of sectors such as assembling car...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es should be high on government agenda. In conclusion, while the productivity gr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78546712803 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24173257913 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9837592378 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17586481288 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058275356578 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457355924133 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973409377399 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322566314609 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.