With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas?
It is true that humans should search for new sources of oil and gas in wilderness areas due to the increasing demand for energy sources of fossil fuels. Despite some obvious advantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there is a major benefit when exploring new sources of fossil fuels into new areas. With the increasing population and industrialization, there is a higher demand for manufacturing and utilizing, followed by the huge amount of fossil fuels such as gas and oil consumed. According to the researches conducted in 2018, a Vietnamese family used the average number of electricity which was double, compared to that last decade. Therefore, it is essential to explore many new sources of gas and oil in unexploited areas apart from the existing ones.
On the other hand, I believe that the drawbacks are far more noticeable than such advantages. One reason for this view is that exploiting the new areas to look for sources of fossil fuels imposes negative impacts on ecosystems. This can pose a threat to the habitats of wildlife, deforestation, as a consequence of climate change. If these issues happen, humans will cope with natural disasters including floods, droughts, acid rain,...Another reason is putting a burden on the national budget. In fact, not every country is wealthy enough to pay for various arising expenditures such as maintenance costs and construction. As a result, instead of looking for sources of these non-renewable energies, it is much more vital to generate unconventional resources.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the disadvantages of this trend are more significant than the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | Trần Thị Ngọc Mai | 73 | view |
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving the languages of a few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 67
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 84
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... demand for manufacturing and utilizing, followed by the huge amount of fossil fu...
^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...rs including floods, droughts, acid rain,...Another reason is putting a burden on ...
^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ncluding floods, droughts, acid rain,...Another reason is putting a burden on the natio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, apart from, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15162454874 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11297694306 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.894490318 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.769230769 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378432710824 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114978082264 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12435401688 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212595479613 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132394593157 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.