Some people argue that raising the price of petrol is the best method of solving increasing problems caused by transportation. I completely disagree with this opinion, and I believe better solutions are to develop transportation technology and improve laws on traffic.
By raising the price of petrol, traffic and environmental problems will be slightly improved but it won’t change significantly. Firstly, high expenditure on petrol only affects people who are less well- off. Those who afford petrol and cars easily do not take it into account and they just use vehicles as before. Secondly, it may lead to other traffic problems without adjustment of public transportation. We drive cars because the need for traveling actually exists. If the use of cars are restricted by petrol cost, there should be some substitute to meet our demands. But public transports only function well in limited situations.
Development of transportation technology and legislation concerning traffic are effective ways to solve these problems. Self-driving cars have been put into use in some countries nowadays. It is much safer because artificial intelligence do not get exhausted and are not distracted. And with the aid of self-driving technology, there will be fewer cars on the road but still meet the demand of people. For example, we can just take a Uber instead of driving on our own so we do not have to buy a car and leave it idle most time. Implement of laws will reduce traffic accidents and pollution. It is substantial that car accidents have decreased a lot since the legislation on drunk driving. And the limitation of unqualified cars on the road can reduce emission respectively.
In conclusion, merely higher price of petrol makes limited effects on improving traffic situations and reducing pollution. It is necessary to advance traffic technology and strengthen road legislation.
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000
- The maps below show the changes of a school from 1985 to present time Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 11
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f people. For example, we can just take a Uber instead of driving on our own so w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28476821192 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07674165241 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7817062364 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8947368421 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188636457355 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564840161851 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052491087059 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124280875318 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300364529389 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.