Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and air pollution problems. To some extent do you agree?
it goes without saying that both traffic multiplication and atmosphere contamination pose a gargantuan threat to human existence. Bulk of figures assert that the most favourable solution addressing the two matters is to put up the petrol cost to a certain extent. In this following essay, my total disapproval together with a myriad of evidence will be stated clearly.
In terms of traffic problems, should government raise the petrol price without limitation on the amount of vehicles' application, there may well be nearly of no use. it is the portion of private means of transport expanding endlessly day-by-day which causing the traffic issue. Imposing strict ordinance on the mass of individual conveyance is the substantive method to reduce the flow of traffic rather than boosting petrol fee. Secondly, it is undisputed that augment petrol charge is a kind of inflation. The input expense remains unchanged, in the meantime, the output ones is exorbitant. The incompatible expenditure between the former and later results in the exacerbation of the situation.
In view of the pollution ones, the principal reason of atmosphere contamination matter consists in the awareness of citizens rather than the petrol price. The imperative task needs to be completed is to alter the citizen's attitude toward the case which leads to the decreasing of this catastrophe. In addition, the government must give a go-ahead to manufacture the air filtering installed in all the factory output emission. Such was the convenience refinement that the emission be reduced.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that uprising the charge of petrol view must be changed due to its numerous disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it goes without saying that both traffic m...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...on, there may well be nearly of no use. it is the portion of private means of tran...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...k needs to be completed is to alter the citizens attitude toward the case which leads to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35205992509 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07996818859 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8603251428 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134396573896 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379540093806 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353788473797 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695725361176 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264774000001 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.