Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

People have different views about how to deal with increasing vehicles and pollution problems. In my opinion, I agree that making petrol become more pricy is the effective way than others in solving these problems.

The first reason is if the price of petrol goes up, people will reduce the amount of petrol that they consume. They can change to use another transport such as bus, bicycle, etc which are cheaper in using than vehicles ran by petrol. For example, in Vietnam, the employee tends to use bus rapid transit or BRT in travelling to work to reduce the emission in the atmosphere. As a result, the amount of the vehicle on the street decline, so not only traffic density but also pollution problems will be solved.

The second reason is the increase in the price of petrol will encourage people to use the vehicle which friendly with the environment. For example, inhabitants in America are using electric cars that are manufactured by Tesla company instead of using automobile ran by petrol. The factories in China use the machines that run on hydrogen. They use it because they are aware of the importance in protecting nature and these cars are very fashionable. As a consequence, this switch will tackle the pollution problems. Furthermore, the high price may also impulse scientist research and find out the new type of energy replace the petrol, which is friendly and suitable for all kinds of vehicles.

In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, increase the price of petrol is the effective way to reduce the consumption of this energy. Some measures could be taken by the government to solve the problems. One possible answer is investing in the research and development to detect the new type of energy and vehicle to reduce pollution.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-02 happyhappy 89 view
2019-11-17 julieehung 67 view
2019-10-15 Chi Hoang 73 view
2019-10-13 Chi Hoang 73 view
2019-08-30 ghikar 78 view
Essays by user tuhiu123 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61911562682 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4044582822 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196766476055 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689615056901 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568770535514 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135166761003 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504363474809 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.