Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
The growing traffic and pollution is one of the major problems in our society. This dramatic rise because of number of car and privet vehicle has increased in large urban area. Some people think that increasing the price of patrol is one of the effective ways to solve this problem. I disagree with this opinion to a large extent and this easy will explain why.
In urban area the number of car and private vehicles is increasing day by day. The higher price of petrol cannot reduce the traffic and pollution because after increasing the price of petrol people will use alternative resources like gas. For example, nowadays number of vehicle such as car and bus are running by gas. People convert their vehicle into gas because the price of gas is cheaper than the petrol. So reduce the private vehicle is one of the way to solve this problem. Government should find out the illegal car and banning those cars. Government can impose some toll on the busiest rode. Then people find alternative way to travel their destination.
On the other hand, tax impose on privet car can solve rising traffic and pollution problems. People who buy more cars will pay more tax on their cars. As a result people will buy limited car and it can solve the problem. People can use alternative vehicles like bicycle and train can reduce this problems. For example, in Germany most of the people use bicycles for reach their destination. People use train for long distance travel. For this reason traffic and pollution are free in Germany. So government should take some necessary steps to solving this problem. Banning some car and use alternative transport can reduce traffic and pollution problem in our society.
In conclusion, increasing ownership of privet vehicles has result number of traffic and pollution problem. Only rising price of petrol cannot solve this problem. In my opinion, other alternative way like impose tax on privet vehicle and use alternative transport may reduce the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Given two bar chart shows destination of undergraduates and postgraduates student of the UK,other than full-time work in the year of 2008. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the green house gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...icles like bicycle and train can reduce this problems. For example, in Germany most ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41975633776 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401785714286 0.561755894193 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2520282464 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.125 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149322355282 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547216415624 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527995612062 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114531490643 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285617426166 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.