The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart provide information the four main reasons causes the worldwide land degradation while the table shows the these land degradation affected in three regions namely, North America, Europe and Oceania in the year of 1990s.
Overall, the main causes of land degradation were over-grazing and deforestation, and Europe was the most affected regions by land degradation than the other two regions.
According to the pie chart, total 65% of land degradation causes for over-grazing and deforestation which was 35% and 30% respectively. Then 28% of worldwide land degradation causes for over-cultivation of crops. The only 7% of land degradation causes for other reasons.
These causes affected in different regions in 1990s. In Europe most of the land degradation causes for deforestation was 9.8%, while the impact of this on North America and Oceania was minimal, only 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. The highest overall percentage of land degraded in Europe was 23%, also sufferd from over-cultivation was 7.7% and over-grazing was 5.5%. In contrast, Oceania had total 13% of land degraded mainly due to over-grazing was 11.3%. On the other hand, North America was the lowest proportion of land degraded at only 5%, and these causes for the over cultivation was 3.3%, and Over-grazing was 1.5%.
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...se causes affected in different regions in 1990s. In Europe most of the land degradation...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was 3.3%, and Over-grazing was 1.5%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06640395333 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8713701282 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208187471043 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125919416119 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110449676718 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186008374616 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114222649621 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.