Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Over the past few decades, congestion and contamination have become burning issues around the world. While people suggest that increasing the petrol’s price is the most effective way to solve these problems, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint and I believe that there are more other constructive measures.
The increase in the price of petrol seem a logical solution to deal with the traffic and pollution issues; however, it is too difficult to put into practice. In many countries, petrol is used as the main fuel for various kind of vehicles that serve people daily transportation. For that reason, an increase in the cost of gasoline hardly affect the frequent use of the transport, therefore, neither the traffic jams nor contamination problems can be solved completely.
Instead of increasing the gasoline price, there are other effective ways to tackle the traffic and pollution problems. It is important to raise people’s awareness of protecting the environment by universalizing the use of alternative renewable energy. For example, the green fuels have been applied in many developed countries to replace the fossil fuels such as petrol or coal. The second measure is encouraging people to use the public transports such as buses and subways to reduce the traffic volume. Besides, the government should also improve the traffic systems as well as the public transport infrastructure.
In conclusion, the increase in the price of petrol is not a practical solution to protect the environment and solve the traffic problems. Therefore, it is more plausible to promote the use of alternative energies as well as develop efficient public transportation amenities to motive people to switch away from petrol-used vehicle.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant (at least 150 words 61
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39781021898 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04111848169 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9939478894 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213289645854 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880780068218 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929208576217 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137289961151 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150392846059 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.