With growth of population and urbanization, the traffic congestion and air pollution have become actual issues in the todays society. Most people believe that soaring petrol price is the best way to tackle these issues. Others suggest that rising the petrol prices will reflect on the low economy residents. Personally, I disagree with they idea that higher petrol prices could solve these problems and I believe that various other measures would be more effective.
To start with, oil and gas play a fundamental role in the industry. Since most of machinery used in different industries are operated by petrol. For instance, recent study in Japan revealed that 80% of all businesses depend on price of petrol. In addition, higher prices of fuel will influence the prices of various goods in the market through rising the cost of their transportation. As a result, the prices of goods would be rising up and affecting consumers. Undoubtly, the growth of oil and gas prices will create new problems.
However, there are some other ways to tackle traffic jams and pollution in cities. Improving methods of public transportation and increasing their availability will significantly reduce the use of cars. For example, a study published in the USA showed that upgrading in the different means of public transportation such as buses and trains resulted in decrease the number of traffic jams by around 25%. Moreover, government should invest more on repairing, expanding and constructing new roads.
To sum up, the growth of fuel prices is not the good way to solve traffic and pollution problems because it is a reason causing the rising of supplies cost. Although we have several alternative methods to deal with these problems as developing public transport and expanding the quantity of roads.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- The development of technology has caused environmental problems So some people think people should choose a simpler way of life while others think we should use technology to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...lution have become actual issues in the todays society. Most people believe that soari...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... solve these problems and I believe that various other measures would be more eff...
^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lay a fundamental role in the industry. Since most of machinery used in different ind...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16095890411 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76833309712 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9308581501 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190714568515 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631782459284 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514246271373 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115013859826 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509011095065 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.