Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Protecting the environment has always been a heated topic of the public, especially with regards to whom are suitably in charge of improving the environment. Many people say that individuals cannot do anything to help the natural surroundings to become better, and they also stated that only the authorities and big companies can contribute to making a difference. However, from my point of view, individuals still can take actions to help with environmental improvements, which is donating and spreading awareness to people in the society.
First of all, donating money to non-profit organizations so that they can plant trees around the world is one way of embarking on improving the natural surroundings. There are many different means of donating, one of them is through using applications on mobile phone, namely 'Ecosia'. This is an app and also a search engine and each ten times you use it to search something online, a tree will be planted somewhere on the Earth, which will benefit the environment. Up to now, 'Ecosia' has planted nearly 106 million trees around the world. If it was not for the help of each person in the society, there would not be so many trees planted on our planet.
Last but not least, spreading awareness is always a simple yet effective way to stepping one step closer to a better environment. With the help of different platforms of social media, people can speak up about the current situation and help others to be more aware of protecting the ecosystem. As a social media user, I have seen many pages that truly care about our planet and give people helpful information, for example Little Sun or The National Resources Defense Council.
In conclusion, although the authorities and large companies can play an important role in making a difference in the environment, each and every individual are capable to do something to this matter too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon 73
- The 2 maps below show the changes that have taken place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 Summarise the best relevant points and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text message face to face communication will become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ing the natural surroundings. There are many different means of donating, one of them is throu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96835443038 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83092570763 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.2967216468 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194625966772 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678180410497 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827016667789 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139016396585 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961601665279 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.