Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There are not any activities that public may participate while enhancing the environment and the only impacting essentials for these are the high officials and famous corporations. I completely disagree with the statement as people can instill respective behavior towards environment and they can also support governments and businesses.
The human today are becoming more and more literate and there are many things that they can do in order to protect the surroundings. They can show their reverence towards the nature and can protect the environment. For example, firstly, they can conduct awareness campaign about the importance of environment and nature so that locals become more aware about the consequences of their activities. Secondly, they can install garbage bucket or dig garbage pond in the locality, resulting the accumulation of waste in such storages. Lastly, they can conduct or actively participate in forestation in the village. This activity is crucial for the protection of environment. Thus, there are a lot of things that public can do in order to protect our surrounding environment.
Government and large companies' effort of securing the environment is worthless, if there is no active participation from the citizens. So, the individuals can assist the government or industry in order to protect the environment. For this, they can strictly follow the rules and regulations made by the corporate. Moreover, they can select volunteers from the locality in order to help the officials in the activity or campaign of environmental protection conducted by the government or large corporations. Not only this, villagers themselves can stop the forest fire using the local resources often used by them. Similarly, literate public can give information to big factories about the alternative way of production resulting pollution reduction. For instance, they can research the alternative fuel source than one, which is impacting the environment a lot. By following such activities, individuals can give supportive hand to the government or other major businesses.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the statement of that there is nothing people can do in order to protect the environment and only high officials and reputed organizations can do that, as people can conduct several activities in their locality, and they can also support such corporations in order to protect the surroundings. Given the above, it is recommended that environmental protection must be our first priority and we must not get away while it is about an environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative development 84
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think is a positive or negative development 73
- It is better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ing environment. Government and large companies effort of securing the environment is w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.3376753507 360% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44278606965 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15444464632 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460199004975 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8840060686 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.157894737 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250379516365 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929429206925 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461176150863 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177608887042 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335629591668 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.